There are many career paths that you can take in the military. The obvious ones include those that involve fighting, but there are a whole lot of jobs that don’t. For every infantryman who carries a rifle into harm’s way there are anywhere from three to ten or more men and women in uniform who make sure that the grunt on patrol has the ammunition, water, fuel, and everything else he might need. Every tank has a crew of four, but before it rumbles into the fight dozens of mechanics and ordnance specialists and electricians perform hours and hours of maintenance to make sure that the vehicle is in tip-top shape. For every naval aviator who catapults from the deck of an aircraft carrier there are thousands of shipmates aboard who do everything from chipping paint from the rusty decks to keeping the nuclear reactors on line to making and serving chow.
Those jobs are all crucial in order for the military to accomplish its mission of keeping the nation safe. Interestingly, within the military itself, even though all of those duties are important there is a definite difference in the prestige associated with them. In the Marine Corps, for example, the infantry is considered to the ultimate expression of the service; everything else as they say is just support. In the Air Force it is the fighter pilots who have ruled the roost for decades, and in the Navy the ship drivers and aviators are those who wield the most power. For the Army, it is the infantry and armor branches that hold the most distinction.
Unfortunately the most prestigious positions in the military are also those with the least direct corollary to civilian employment. There are no civilian infantry battalions, fighter squadrons, tank platoons, or aircraft carriers. There are, however, plenty of jobs in those support areas that are often viewed as second class within the military. The civilian world does not need artillerymen, but it does need electricians. It needs truck drivers, and mechanics, and logisticians.
In short, the civilian world needs people with definable and useful skills.
Skills, for example, that an employer can put to work immediately without taking the risk of hiring someone who may or may not know enough about the business to be effective.
Unfortunately, many of the skills that those in uniform who have spent the majority of their time at the pointy end of the spear have developed are not directly transferable to the corporate sector. Being a leader is great, and undoubtedly the leadership skills that our warriors have gained in Iraq and Afghanistan are first rate. That is great for the military because leading people to do amazing things is what the military is all about, and the best military leaders we have are those who are dedicated to mastering their craft and being the most proficient soldiers or sailors or Marines possible.
Leadership in the civilian world is leadership in a different context. An infantryman can demonstrate his leadership through arduous training, bravery, and a consummate grasp of tactics, weapons, and equipment. By being a first rate infantryman, he can lead by example and inspire his fellows and juniors to shoulder their loads and step out to meet the enemy. The best leaders we have are those who are the best at what they do: they are the best infantrymen or tankers or pilots or ship drivers.
The civilian world is no different. The best CEOs are those who have dedicated themselves to learning their businesses inside and out. They inspire their people to great achievement by understanding their industry and markets and customers and then being able to align the company’s employees to meet their goals and objectives. They challenge their people and recognize those who excel. Instead of using medals to motivate their corporate troops, they use other things such as money and stock options and trips to the Bahamas. They lead by example and are masters of their craft.
It is here that the perception that many military leaders, particularly those in the combat arms, runs awry. I cannot count the number of conversations that I have had with my peers and friends in uniform in which we talked about how we, the combat leaders, had all the skills that would make us tremendous leaders and invaluable assets to any company that would be lucky enough to hire us.
How wrong we were.
Sure, corporations want great leaders. Every company does. They also want people who know their business or have a skill that the firm needs. Therein lies the rub, and brings to mind a story from my days as a young and motivated Captain:
I once had an officer who was a student of mine at the artillery school. He was a graduate of the Citadel, which is a renowned military college in South Carolina. As a cadet there he rose to a high position of leadership in the Corps of Cadets, and he was without a doubt a fine leader. That said, he was a lousy student. When I asked him why this was so, he answered that he joined the military to lead men and learning about how to load and fire an artillery piece was interesting but not particularly relevant to his desire to be the next MacArthur.
I explained to him that leadership is not something that you have because of rank or position, but instead it is something that is earned through the respect of those you lead. He would never be a good leader in the artillery if he did not show that he was a solid artilleryman, and to be a solid artilleryman he had to learn how to load and fire an artillery piece. People who show up and start barking orders without knowing what they are talking about are idiots, not leaders.
That is the point that so many people in the military miss. Sure, we all developed leadership styles that inspire young men and women to enthusiastically throw themselves into the crucible of combat, but those styles were largely based on our professionalism and mastery of our martial craft. None of those same people would have followed us if we didn’t know what we were doing.
The lesson here is that if you, as a military leader, want to bring your talents to the civilian world you will need to more than just be a “leader”. You will need to differentiate yourself and show that you can do more than just lead. Can you read a balance sheet? How about a profit and loss statement? Do you understand marketing, or finance, or accounting, or any of the countless other things that make the business world run?
The corporate sector has lots of great leaders. How would you feel, as an infantryman, if the CEO of a company was hired to become your battalion commander and take you into combat? Would you follow him? Of course not. Why, then, do so many military folks drink their own bathwater and believe that they corporate sector is waiting for them to leave the service and take over their businesses?
To be competitive in the job market it is important for each and every person who transitions from military service to find something that they can offer a potential employer besides war stories. Those who have learned a skill or trade, while maybe not being on the front lines and earning medals for valor, take those skills with them when the leave the service. That is their point of differentiation that separates them from all of the other candidates for a job.
As a leader, what is yours?